patients whose TPA progressed by 0.05 cm2 in
the first year of follow-up were 2.1 times (95%
CI, 1.2 to 3.6; p=0.005) more likely to have had
a stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death
over 5 years, than patients who had regression or
no change in plaque area
18
. In high-risk patients
with asymptomatic carotid stenosis in Canada,
“treating arteries” as opposed to treating
cardiovascular risk factors was associated with a
> 80% reduction in the two-year risk of stroke
and myocardial infarction15. Among moderate-
risk patients aged> 65 years attending prevention
clinics in Argentina between 2011 and 2015,
“treating arteries” was associated with a decline
in the annual risk of CVD events from 5.8% to
2.35%
19
. We hypothesized that blood pressure
and serum LDL cholesterol control at target
values (recommended in current clinical
guidelines) is not sufficient to reduce the
progression of atherosclerosis in patients with
high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
Objectives
1. Evaluate the progression of TPA in high-risk
patients whose blood pressure and serum LDL
cholesterol are controlled.
2. Determine if classical cardiovascular risk
factors and time between TPA studies are
associated with the progression of TPA.
Methods
Study design and population: The study
population was composed of patients referred by
physicians to a Light and Force and Railroad
Unions Health Maintenance Organizations (Luz
y Fuerza and Obra Social Ferroviaria),
participating in an atherosclerosis prevention
program (LifeQualityA) conducted by Blossom
DMO Argentina. The program was initiated in
2008 and continues at present, with a total of
4531 participants, white Latin men represent
41.3%, mean+SD age (58+14 years), and is
based in Buenos Aires and Cordoba, Argentina.
The inclusion of a volunteer in the program
started with the stratification of cardiometabolic
risk by using the FRS based on body mass index
(BMI). Those subjects with a 10-year risk score
≤ 6% were assigned to management by a General
Practitioner (GP), while those with scores> 6%
were re-tested using the Framingham Post-test
algorithm. After this stratification with the
Framingham Post-test algorithm, subjects with
scores <20% were assigned to follow-up by GP
while those with scores ≥ 20% were assigned to
the cardiometabolic high-risk group as the High-
Risk Control Service thereafter. This service
consists of a multidisciplinary team of
physicians, nutritionists, educators, gym trainers,
psychologists, and health workers.
Also, the follow-up subjects meeting the criteria
of controlled risk factors were awarded free-of-
charge medication. These criteria were: HbA1c
<7%, Total Cholesterol <200 mg/dl, and BP <
130/80 mmHg, among others19. The present
study was carried out in participants enrolled
between November 2017 and May 2021. In total
there were 742 participants, of these 184
participants had more than one study and no
cardiovascular events. After excluding Diabetic
participants, current smokers, and participants
with out-of-range blood pressure and cholesterol
values for the analysis, we analyzed 57
participants with the inclusion criteria (Blood
Pressure less than 130/80, Serum LDL
Cholesterol less 100 mg/dl and Framingham
score at 10 years more than 20%) (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Block Diagram of the research.
The protocol was approved by the Committee on
Independent Institutional Ethics of the National
University of Córdoba and the Rusculleda
Foundation. Reader reliability was estimated by
randomly assigning scans of 22 patients to
interpretation by 2 different readers.
Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: For this
analysis, we include participants over 40 years of
age, with a risk of acute myocardial infarction
greater than 20% at ten years based on TPA,
participants (with or without antihypertensive
medication or Hypertension) with blood pressure
< 130 mmHg systolic and < 80 mmHg diastolic
based on blood pressure determination in clinical
follow-up, ambulatory blood pressure
monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring,
LDL-C <100 mg/dl in at least two separate
measurements >3 months apart, and written
informed consent given. Excluded were current
smokers, participants who had Type I or type II
diabetes, a history of previous cardiovascular
events, a history of neoplasm, kidney disease
(eGFR less than 60 ml/min), endocrinological
disease, rheumatological disease, immunological